Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Leominster, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Leominster, MA.
| Data | Findlay | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 43,646 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $75,620 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Leominster
- The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 40,249 in Findlay.
- The median age in Leominster is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.1 years in Findlay.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620, compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- In Leominster, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Leominster.
- The unemployment rate in Findlay is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.2% in Leominster.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 83 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Leominster
- In Leominster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Findlay.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 8% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 4% in Findlay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Findlay and Leominster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leominster at 23.5% versus 22.5% in Findlay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Findlay at 19.5% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Findlay at 37.6% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Findlay at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 1.1% (477) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 18.2% (7,932) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 13.5% (5,889) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 24.1% (10,530) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 18.2% in Leominster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leominster at 13.5%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- In Leominster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 19.6% in Findlay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.