Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Keno, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Keno, OR.
| Data | Findlay | Keno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 3,083 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $69,421 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Keno
- In Findlay, the population is higher at 40,249, compared to 3,083 in Keno.
- The median age in Keno is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 38.1 years in Findlay.
- Keno has a higher median income of $69,421, compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- In Keno, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Findlay.
- The poverty level is identical in both Findlay and Keno at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Findlay is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Keno.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Keno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Keno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Keno
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Findlay at 3% compared to 0% in Keno.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 82% in Keno.
- In Keno, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Findlay.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Findlay at 8% compared to 6% in Keno.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keno at 5%, compared to 4% in Findlay.
- In Keno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Findlay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Keno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Keno
- More residents in Findlay report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Keno.
- Depression is more prevalent in Findlay at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Keno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Findlay at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Keno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Keno.
- Obesity rates are higher in Findlay at 37.6% compared to 0.0% in Keno.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keno at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Findlay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Keno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 0.2% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 22.0% (678) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 16.6% (512) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 12.9% (398) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Keno
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Keno.
- In Keno, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 21.2% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keno at 16.6%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 12.9% in Keno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.