Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Groves, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Groves, TX.
| Data | Findlay | Groves |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 16,798 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $64,737 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Groves
- In Findlay, the population is higher at 40,249, compared to 16,798 in Groves.
- The median age in Groves is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 38.1 years in Findlay.
- Groves has a higher median income of $64,737, compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- In Groves, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Findlay.
- The poverty level is identical in both Findlay and Groves at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Findlay is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.2% in Groves.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Groves provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Groves |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | 83 | 44 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Groves
- In Groves, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 44% in Groves.
- In Groves, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Findlay.
- Groves has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Groves at 14%, compared to 4% in Findlay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Findlay and Groves at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Groves |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Groves
- In Groves, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Groves at 22.7% versus 22.5% in Findlay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Findlay at 19.5% compared to 18.5% in Groves.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Groves at 18.0% compared to 17.5% in Findlay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Findlay at 37.6% compared to 34.8% in Groves.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Groves at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Findlay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Groves |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 3.8% (638) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 18.1% (3,039) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 16.3% (2,731) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 9.9% (1,655) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Groves
- In Groves, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.3% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 18.1% in Groves.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Groves at 16.3%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 9.9% in Groves.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.