Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Grand rapids, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Grand rapids, MI.
| Data | Findlay | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 196,908 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $61,634 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Grand rapids
- The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 40,249 in Findlay.
- Residents in Findlay have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634, compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Findlay at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand rapids at 14%, compared to 10% in Findlay.
- Grand rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.7% in Findlay.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 18 |
| White | 83 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 3% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Findlay.
- Grand rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 8% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand rapids at 11%, compared to 4% in Findlay.
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Findlay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 22.5% in Findlay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Findlay at 19.5% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Grand rapids.
- Obesity rates are higher in Findlay at 37.6% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- Disability percentages are higher in Findlay at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 1.2% (2,304) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 12.4% (24,420) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 12.2% (23,971) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 25.6% (50,441) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand rapids at 12.2%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 19.6% in Findlay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.