Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Findlay | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Flomaton
- In Findlay, the population is higher at 40,249, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Findlay have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Findlay has a higher median income of $54,986 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Findlay and Flomaton at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 10% in Findlay.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.7% in Findlay.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 38 |
| White | 83 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 3% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- The Asian population is larger in Findlay at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Findlay at 8% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- Both Findlay and Flomaton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Findlay and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 22.5% in Findlay.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 19.5% in Findlay.
- Binge drinking is more common in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 37.6% in Findlay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Findlay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 21.2% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.