Demographics details for Fillmore, NY vs Costa mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fillmore, NY vs Costa mesa, CA.
Data | Fillmore | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Population | 652 | 109,521 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $70,677 | $104,981 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Fillmore vs Costa mesa
- The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 652 in Fillmore.
- Residents in Fillmore have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $70,677 in Fillmore.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fillmore at 48.0% compared to 36.0% in Costa mesa.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fillmore and Costa mesa at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Fillmore is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Fillmore vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fillmore | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 99 | 40 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 37 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fillmore vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Fillmore.
- Fillmore has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Fillmore.
- Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 0% in Fillmore.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 1% in Fillmore.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fillmore.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fillmore | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 10.4% |
Depression | 25.9% | 18.5% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 10.9% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 27.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fillmore vs Costa mesa
- More residents in Fillmore report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fillmore at 25.9% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fillmore at 22.4% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fillmore at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Costa mesa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fillmore at 36.7% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fillmore and Costa mesa at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fillmore | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (2,006) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (141) | 11.3% (12,406) |
Less than High School | 0.9% (6) | 17.3% (18,969) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (142) | 31.2% (34,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fillmore vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Fillmore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fillmore hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Costa mesa at 17.3%, compared to 0.9% in Fillmore.
- In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 21.8% in Fillmore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.