Demographics details for Fifield, WI vs Port arthur, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fifield, WI vs Port arthur, TX.

Data Fifield Port arthur
Population 879 55,579
Median Age 50.0 years 33.7 years
Median Income $50,000 $45,357
Married Families 20.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 10% 23%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 11.0

Population Comparison: Fifield vs Port arthur

  • The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 879 in Fifield.
  • Residents in Fifield have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
  • Fifield has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
  • In Port arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 10% in Fifield.
  • Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Fifield.

Demographics

Demographics Fifield vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fifield Port arthur
Black Data is updating 43
White 100 3
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic Data is updating 34
Two or More Races Data is updating 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fifield vs Port arthur

  • In Port arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 0% in Fifield.
  • Fifield has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
  • In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Fifield.
  • Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 0% in Fifield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 0% in Fifield.
  • In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fifield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fifield Port arthur
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.9%
Depression Data is updating% 20.4%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.9%
Obesity Data is updating% 42.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fifield vs Port arthur

  • In Port arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Port arthur at 20.4% versus 0.0% in Fifield.
  • Port arthur has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port arthur at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • Port arthur has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fifield Port arthur
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.5% (1,383)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.6% (10,902)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.7% (13,180)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.1% (3,955)

Education Levels Comparison: Fifield vs Port arthur

  • In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • In Port arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port arthur at 23.7%, compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
  • In Port arthur, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.