Demographics details for Ferndale, WA vs Manhattan, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ferndale, WA vs Manhattan, MT.
Data | Ferndale | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,840 | 2,120 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $82,466 | $57,045 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Ferndale vs Manhattan
- In Ferndale, the population is higher at 15,840, compared to 2,120 in Manhattan.
- The median age in Manhattan is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 32.9 years in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $82,466 compared to $57,045 in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ferndale at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is higher in Manhattan at 10%, compared to 6% in Ferndale.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ferndale and Manhattan at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Ferndale vs Manhattan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ferndale | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 71 | 94 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 13 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ferndale vs Manhattan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ferndale and Manhattan at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manhattan at 94% compared to 71% in Ferndale.
- The Asian population is larger in Ferndale at 7% compared to 0% in Manhattan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ferndale at 13% compared to 2% in Manhattan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ferndale at 7% compared to 3% in Manhattan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ferndale at 2% compared to 1% in Manhattan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ferndale | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Depression | 29.9% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 24.2% |
Obesity | 25.3% | 24.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ferndale vs Manhattan
- More residents in Ferndale report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.4% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ferndale at 29.9% compared to 22.7% in Manhattan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ferndale at 14.4% compared to 13.5% in Manhattan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manhattan at 24.2% compared to 18.1% in Ferndale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ferndale at 25.3% compared to 24.2% in Manhattan.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ferndale and Manhattan at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ferndale | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (186) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.5% (1,827) | 15.3% (325) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (979) | 0.6% (12) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.5% (3,248) | 18.5% (392) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ferndale vs Manhattan
- A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Manhattan.
- In Manhattan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 11.5% in Ferndale.
- More residents in Ferndale have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 0.6% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 18.5% in Manhattan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.