Demographics details for Ferndale, WA vs Livermore, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ferndale, WA vs Livermore, CA.
| Data | Ferndale | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,840 | 84,701 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $82,466 | $152,590 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Ferndale vs Livermore
- The population in Livermore is higher at 84,701, compared to 15,840 in Ferndale.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 32.9 years in Ferndale.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $152,590, compared to $82,466 in Ferndale.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Livermore.
- The unemployment rate in Ferndale is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Ferndale vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ferndale | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 71 | 44 |
| Asian | 7 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ferndale vs Livermore
- In Livermore, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 44% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 7% in Ferndale.
- Livermore has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 13% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livermore at 13%, compared to 7% in Ferndale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ferndale at 2% compared to 1% in Livermore.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ferndale | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 25.3% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ferndale vs Livermore
- More residents in Ferndale report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Livermore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ferndale at 29.9% compared to 19.6% in Livermore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ferndale at 14.4% compared to 9.4% in Livermore.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Livermore at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Ferndale.
- Livermore has higher obesity rates at 26.6% compared to 25.3% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ferndale at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ferndale | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (186) | 1.4% (1,173) |
| High School Diploma | 11.5% (1,827) | 9.5% (8,051) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (979) | 7.8% (6,576) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.5% (3,248) | 35.4% (30,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ferndale vs Livermore
- In Livermore, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Ferndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale hold a high school diploma at 11.5% compared to 9.5% in Livermore.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Livermore at 7.8%, compared to 6.2% in Ferndale.
- In Livermore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 20.5% in Ferndale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.