Demographics details for Ferndale, WA vs Kaysville, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ferndale, WA vs Kaysville, UT.

Data Ferndale Kaysville
Population 15,840 32,761
Median Age 32.9 years 32.1 years
Median Income $82,466 $121,867
Married Families 38.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.7

Population Comparison: Ferndale vs Kaysville

  • The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 15,840 in Ferndale.
  • Residents in Ferndale have a higher median age of 32.9 years compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
  • Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $82,466 in Ferndale.
  • In Kaysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Ferndale.
  • Ferndale has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
  • The unemployment rate in Ferndale is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Kaysville.

Demographics

Demographics Ferndale vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ferndale Kaysville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 71 88
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 13 5
Two or More Races 7 6
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ferndale vs Kaysville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ferndale and Kaysville at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Kaysville at 88% compared to 71% in Ferndale.
  • The Asian population is larger in Ferndale at 7% compared to 1% in Kaysville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Ferndale at 13% compared to 5% in Kaysville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Ferndale at 7% compared to 6% in Kaysville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ferndale at 2% compared to 0% in Kaysville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ferndale Kaysville
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 8.7%
Depression 29.9% 23.7%
Smoking 14.4% 6.7%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 11.4%
Obesity 25.3% 31.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ferndale vs Kaysville

  • More residents in Ferndale report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ferndale at 29.9% compared to 23.7% in Kaysville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ferndale at 14.4% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ferndale at 18.1% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
  • Kaysville has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 25.3% in Ferndale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Ferndale at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ferndale Kaysville
No Schooling 1.2% (186) 0.4% (141)
High School Diploma 11.5% (1,827) 6.1% (1,986)
Less than High School 6.2% (979) 2.6% (859)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.5% (3,248) 28.5% (9,340)

Education Levels Comparison: Ferndale vs Kaysville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Kaysville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale hold a high school diploma at 11.5% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
  • More residents in Ferndale have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
  • In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 20.5% in Ferndale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.