Demographics details for Ferndale, MI vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ferndale, MI vs Taylorsville, UT.
Data | Ferndale | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,969 | 57,879 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $86,120 | $81,417 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Ferndale vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 18,969 in Ferndale.
- Residents in Ferndale have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $86,120 compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 32.0% in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Ferndale is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Ferndale vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ferndale | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 81 | 57 |
Asian | 3 | 7 |
Hispanic | 4 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ferndale vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ferndale at 6% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Ferndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Ferndale.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 6% in Ferndale.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ferndale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ferndale | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.4% |
Depression | 21.1% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 10.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 30.4% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ferndale vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Ferndale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 21.1% in Ferndale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ferndale at 12.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ferndale at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 32.0% compared to 30.4% in Ferndale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Ferndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ferndale | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (81) | 1.2% (721) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,139) | 16.9% (9,799) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (1,132) | 15.2% (8,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.0% (8,533) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ferndale vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Ferndale.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 11.3% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 6.0% in Ferndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ferndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.