Demographics details for Fergus falls, MN vs Martinsburg, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fergus falls, MN vs Martinsburg, WV.

Data Fergus falls Martinsburg
Population 14,187 18,953
Median Age 42.0 years 36.4 years
Median Income $48,738 $55,240
Married Families 35.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Fergus falls vs Martinsburg

  • The population in Martinsburg is higher at 18,953, compared to 14,187 in Fergus falls.
  • Residents in Fergus falls have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Martinsburg.
  • Martinsburg has a higher median income of $55,240, compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fergus falls at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Martinsburg.
  • Fergus falls has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Martinsburg.
  • Martinsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Fergus falls.

Demographics

Demographics Fergus falls vs Martinsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fergus falls Martinsburg
Black 1 13
White 93 69
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 1 6
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Martinsburg

  • In Martinsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
  • Fergus falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 69% in Martinsburg.
  • Both Fergus falls and Martinsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Martinsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Martinsburg at 11%, compared to 4% in Fergus falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fergus falls and Martinsburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fergus falls Martinsburg
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 21.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 15.8%
Depression 24.4% 27.7%
Smoking 17.9% 24.7%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 12.6%
Obesity 36.8% 43.0%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Martinsburg

  • In Martinsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 15.6% in Fergus falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Martinsburg at 27.7% versus 24.4% in Fergus falls.
  • Martinsburg has a higher smoking rate at 24.7% compared to 17.9% in Fergus falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 12.6% in Martinsburg.
  • Martinsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 36.8% in Fergus falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Martinsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fergus falls Martinsburg
No Schooling 0.8% (117) 0.8% (144)
High School Diploma 14.4% (2,039) 16.7% (3,171)
Less than High School 8.3% (1,171) 13.5% (2,556)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.7% (2,656) 16.2% (3,077)

Education Levels Comparison: Fergus falls vs Martinsburg

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fergus falls and Martinsburg at 0.8%.
  • In Martinsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Fergus falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Martinsburg at 13.5%, compared to 8.3% in Fergus falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 16.2% in Martinsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.