Demographics details for Fergus falls, MN vs Hoyt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fergus falls, MN vs Hoyt, KS.
| Data | Fergus falls | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,187 | 589 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $48,738 | $73,750 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fergus falls vs Hoyt
- In Fergus falls, the population is higher at 14,187, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
- Residents in Fergus falls have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.0 years in Hoyt.
- Hoyt has a higher median income of $73,750, compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fergus falls.
- Fergus falls has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Hoyt.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fergus falls and Hoyt at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Fergus falls vs Hoyt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fergus falls | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Hoyt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fergus falls at 1% compared to 0% in Hoyt.
- Fergus falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 86% in Hoyt.
- Both Fergus falls and Hoyt have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Hoyt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- Both Fergus falls and Hoyt have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Fergus falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fergus falls | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Hoyt
- In Hoyt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Fergus falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fergus falls at 24.4% compared to 22.2% in Hoyt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fergus falls at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Hoyt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Hoyt.
- Hoyt has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.8% in Fergus falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Hoyt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fergus falls | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (117) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,039) | 26.1% (154) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (1,171) | 12.6% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (2,656) | 17.0% (100) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fergus falls vs Hoyt
- A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 14.4% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hoyt at 12.6%, compared to 8.3% in Fergus falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Hoyt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.