Demographics details for Fergus falls, MN vs Gallitzin, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fergus falls, MN vs Gallitzin, PA.

Data Fergus falls Gallitzin
Population 14,187 1,508
Median Age 42.0 years 39.4 years
Median Income $48,738 $52,500
Married Families 35.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Fergus falls vs Gallitzin

  • In Fergus falls, the population is higher at 14,187, compared to 1,508 in Gallitzin.
  • Residents in Fergus falls have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 39.4 years in Gallitzin.
  • Gallitzin has a higher median income of $52,500, compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fergus falls at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gallitzin at 12%, compared to 9% in Fergus falls.
  • Gallitzin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Fergus falls.

Demographics

Demographics Fergus falls vs Gallitzin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fergus falls Gallitzin
Black 1 Data is updating
White 93 93
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Gallitzin

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fergus falls at 1% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Fergus falls and Gallitzin at 93%.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fergus falls at 1% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
  • Gallitzin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
  • Both Fergus falls and Gallitzin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fergus falls and Gallitzin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fergus falls Gallitzin
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 12.1%
Depression 24.4% 25.2%
Smoking 17.9% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 18.5%
Obesity 36.8% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Gallitzin

  • In Gallitzin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Fergus falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gallitzin at 25.2% versus 24.4% in Fergus falls.
  • Gallitzin has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 17.9% in Fergus falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Gallitzin.
  • Gallitzin has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 36.8% in Fergus falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Fergus falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fergus falls Gallitzin
No Schooling 0.8% (117) 1.1% (16)
High School Diploma 14.4% (2,039) 29.8% (449)
Less than High School 8.3% (1,171) 20.6% (310)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.7% (2,656) 9.9% (150)

Education Levels Comparison: Fergus falls vs Gallitzin

  • In Gallitzin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Fergus falls.
  • In Gallitzin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 14.4% in Fergus falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallitzin at 20.6%, compared to 8.3% in Fergus falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 9.9% in Gallitzin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.