Demographics details for Fergus falls, MN vs Altoona, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fergus falls, MN vs Altoona, WI.
Data | Fergus falls | Altoona |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,187 | 9,139 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $48,738 | $77,002 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fergus falls vs Altoona
- In Fergus falls, the population is higher at 14,187, compared to 9,139 in Altoona.
- Residents in Fergus falls have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.7 years in Altoona.
- Altoona has a higher median income of $77,002, compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fergus falls at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Altoona.
- Fergus falls has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Altoona.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fergus falls and Altoona at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Fergus falls vs Altoona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fergus falls | Altoona |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 93 | 85 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Altoona
- In Altoona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- Fergus falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 85% in Altoona.
- In Altoona, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fergus falls.
- Altoona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Altoona at 7%, compared to 4% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fergus falls and Altoona at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fergus falls | Altoona |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.0% |
Depression | 24.4% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 13.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 25.8% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Altoona
- More residents in Fergus falls report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.6% in Altoona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fergus falls at 24.4% compared to 23.3% in Altoona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fergus falls at 17.9% compared to 13.6% in Altoona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Altoona at 25.8% compared to 19.3% in Fergus falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fergus falls at 36.8% compared to 31.0% in Altoona.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Altoona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fergus falls | Altoona |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (117) | 0.7% (63) |
High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,039) | 12.2% (1,115) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (1,171) | 3.9% (360) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (2,656) | 24.2% (2,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fergus falls vs Altoona
- A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Altoona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 12.2% in Altoona.
- More residents in Fergus falls have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 3.9% in Altoona.
- In Altoona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 18.7% in Fergus falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.