Demographics details for Felton, DE vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Felton, DE vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Felton | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,347 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,536 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Felton vs Clinton
- The population in Clinton is higher at 7,554, compared to 1,347 in Felton.
- Residents in Felton have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Felton has a higher median income of $55,536 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Felton at 35.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 10% in Felton.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Felton.
Demographics
Demographics Felton vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Felton | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 38 |
| White | 75 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Felton vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 16% in Felton.
- Felton has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Felton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Felton at 3% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Felton at 6% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Felton and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Felton | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Felton vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Felton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 20.1% in Felton.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 17.7% in Felton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 14.0% in Felton.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 39.3% in Felton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Felton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Felton | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (17) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (251) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (117) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (224) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Felton vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Felton have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 18.6% in Felton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 8.7% in Felton.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 16.6% in Felton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.