Demographics details for Fedscreek, KY vs Chandlerville, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fedscreek, KY vs Chandlerville, IL.

Data Fedscreek Chandlerville
Population 3,563 514
Median Age 38.2 years 44.8 years
Median Income $37,431 $42,031
Married Families 36.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.2

Population Comparison: Fedscreek vs Chandlerville

  • In Fedscreek, the population is higher at 3,563, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
  • The median age in Chandlerville is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 38.2 years in Fedscreek.
  • Chandlerville has a higher median income of $42,031, compared to $37,431 in Fedscreek.
  • In Chandlerville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Fedscreek has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Chandlerville.
  • The unemployment rate in Fedscreek is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.

Demographics

Demographics Fedscreek vs Chandlerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fedscreek Chandlerville
Black 1 Data is updating
White 94 96
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fedscreek vs Chandlerville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fedscreek at 1% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandlerville at 96% compared to 94% in Fedscreek.
  • Both Fedscreek and Chandlerville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fedscreek at 1% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fedscreek at 4% compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
  • In Chandlerville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fedscreek.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fedscreek Chandlerville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.3%
Depression Data is updating% 22.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 35.6%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fedscreek vs Chandlerville

  • In Chandlerville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chandlerville at 22.9% versus 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Chandlerville has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Chandlerville has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fedscreek at 33.0% compared to 21.0% in Chandlerville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fedscreek Chandlerville
No Schooling 3.6% (129) 1.0% (5)
High School Diploma 22.2% (791) 30.9% (159)
Less than High School 42.4% (1,510) 41.2% (212)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.9% (245) 4.1% (21)

Education Levels Comparison: Fedscreek vs Chandlerville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fedscreek have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.0% in Chandlerville.
  • In Chandlerville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.9% compared to 22.2% in Fedscreek.
  • More residents in Fedscreek have less than a high school education at 42.4% compared to 41.2% in Chandlerville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fedscreek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.