Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Plymouth, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Plymouth, IL.

Data Federal way Plymouth
Population 97,863 427
Median Age 37.4 years 50.0 years
Median Income $80,360 $50,341
Married Families 39.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 9% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Federal way vs Plymouth

  • In Federal way, the population is higher at 97,863, compared to 427 in Plymouth.
  • The median age in Plymouth is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360 compared to $50,341 in Plymouth.
  • In Plymouth, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Federal way and Plymouth at 9%.
  • The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Plymouth.

Demographics

Demographics Federal way vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Federal way Plymouth
Black 17 4
White 34 91
Asian 15 4
Hispanic 19 1
Two or More Races 14 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Plymouth

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 4% in Plymouth.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Plymouth at 91% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • The Asian population is larger in Federal way at 15% compared to 4% in Plymouth.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Federal way at 19% compared to 1% in Plymouth.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 0% in Plymouth.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Federal way at 1% compared to 0% in Plymouth.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Federal way Plymouth
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 12.0%
Depression 24.7% 23.0%
Smoking 12.7% 19.7%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 17.7%
Obesity 27.2% 38.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Plymouth

  • More residents in Federal way report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.4% in Plymouth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Federal way at 24.7% compared to 23.0% in Plymouth.
  • Plymouth has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Plymouth at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
  • Plymouth has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Plymouth at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Federal way Plymouth
No Schooling 1.8% (1,735) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (15,003) 32.3% (138)
Less than High School 11.0% (10,805) 19.7% (84)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (20,761) 8.4% (36)

Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Plymouth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • In Plymouth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.3% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Plymouth at 19.7%, compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 8.4% in Plymouth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.