Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Fernley, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Fernley, NV.
| Data | Federal way | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,863 | 24,261 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $80,360 | $84,025 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Federal way vs Fernley
- In Federal way, the population is higher at 97,863, compared to 24,261 in Fernley.
- Residents in Federal way have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.9 years in Fernley.
- Fernley has a higher median income of $84,025, compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- In Fernley, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Fernley.
- The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.2% in Fernley.
Demographics
Demographics Federal way vs Fernley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Federal way | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 34 | 68 |
| Asian | 15 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Fernley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 2% in Fernley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fernley at 68% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- The Asian population is larger in Federal way at 15% compared to 1% in Fernley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Federal way at 19% compared to 17% in Fernley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 10% in Fernley.
- In Fernley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Federal way.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Federal way | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Fernley
- In Fernley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.5% in Federal way.
- Depression is more prevalent in Federal way at 24.7% compared to 22.3% in Fernley.
- Fernley has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fernley at 17.4% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Fernley has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Federal way and Fernley at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Federal way | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,735) | 1.0% (237) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (15,003) | 19.6% (4,750) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (10,805) | 12.9% (3,133) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (20,761) | 9.7% (2,351) |
Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Fernley
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.0% in Fernley.
- In Fernley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fernley at 12.9%, compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.7% in Fernley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.