Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Eau claire, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Eau claire, WI.
Data | Federal way | Eau claire |
---|---|---|
Population | 97,863 | 69,737 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $80,360 | $63,882 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Federal way vs Eau claire
- In Federal way, the population is higher at 97,863, compared to 69,737 in Eau claire.
- Residents in Federal way have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 32.8 years in Eau claire.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360 compared to $63,882 in Eau claire.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Federal way at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Eau claire.
- The poverty level is higher in Eau claire at 10%, compared to 9% in Federal way.
- The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.0% in Eau claire.
Demographics
Demographics Federal way vs Eau claire provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Federal way | Eau claire |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 1 |
White | 34 | 86 |
Asian | 15 | 6 |
Hispanic | 19 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Eau claire
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 1% in Eau claire.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eau claire at 86% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- The Asian population is larger in Federal way at 15% compared to 6% in Eau claire.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Federal way at 19% compared to 3% in Eau claire.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 4% in Eau claire.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Federal way at 1% compared to 0% in Eau claire.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Federal way | Eau claire |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 24.7% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 24.8% |
Obesity | 27.2% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Eau claire
- More residents in Federal way report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in Eau claire.
- Depression is more prevalent in Federal way at 24.7% compared to 23.6% in Eau claire.
- Eau claire has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eau claire at 24.8% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Eau claire has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eau claire at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Federal way | Eau claire |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (1,735) | 0.5% (340) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (15,003) | 14.2% (9,934) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (10,805) | 3.7% (2,573) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (20,761) | 21.6% (15,073) |
Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Eau claire
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Eau claire.
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 14.2% in Eau claire.
- More residents in Federal way have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 3.7% in Eau claire.
- In Eau claire, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.