Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Beecher city, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Beecher city, IL.

Data Federal way Beecher city
Population 97,863 423
Median Age 37.4 years 36.9 years
Median Income $80,360 $39,297
Married Families 39.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 9% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.2

Population Comparison: Federal way vs Beecher city

  • In Federal way, the population is higher at 97,863, compared to 423 in Beecher city.
  • Residents in Federal way have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Beecher city.
  • Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360 compared to $39,297 in Beecher city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Federal way at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Beecher city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Beecher city at 14%, compared to 9% in Federal way.
  • The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.2% in Beecher city.

Demographics

Demographics Federal way vs Beecher city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Federal way Beecher city
Black 17 Data is updating
White 34 99
Asian 15 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 Data is updating
Two or More Races 14 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Beecher city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beecher city at 99% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • The Asian population is larger in Federal way at 15% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Federal way at 19% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 1% in Beecher city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Federal way at 1% compared to 0% in Beecher city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Federal way Beecher city
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 9.6%
Depression 24.7% 21.4%
Smoking 12.7% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 18.8%
Obesity 27.2% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Beecher city

  • More residents in Federal way report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in Beecher city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Federal way at 24.7% compared to 21.4% in Beecher city.
  • Beecher city has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beecher city at 18.8% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
  • Beecher city has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beecher city at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Federal way Beecher city
No Schooling 1.8% (1,735) 0.7% (3)
High School Diploma 15.3% (15,003) 23.6% (100)
Less than High School 11.0% (10,805) 17.5% (74)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (20,761) 7.1% (30)

Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Beecher city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Beecher city.
  • In Beecher city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beecher city at 17.5%, compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 7.1% in Beecher city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.