Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Bartlett, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Bartlett, IL.
| Data | Federal way | Bartlett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,863 | 40,154 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $80,360 | $126,555 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Federal way vs Bartlett
- In Federal way, the population is higher at 97,863, compared to 40,154 in Bartlett.
- The median age in Bartlett is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Bartlett has a higher median income of $126,555, compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- In Bartlett, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- The poverty level is identical in both Federal way and Bartlett at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 5.6% in Bartlett.
Demographics
Demographics Federal way vs Bartlett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Federal way | Bartlett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 4 |
| White | 34 | 58 |
| Asian | 15 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 4% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bartlett at 58% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Bartlett, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 15% in Federal way.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Federal way at 19% compared to 15% in Bartlett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 5% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Federal way and Bartlett at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Federal way | Bartlett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 27.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Bartlett
- More residents in Federal way report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 12.7% in Bartlett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Federal way at 24.7% compared to 17.2% in Bartlett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Federal way at 12.7% compared to 11.4% in Bartlett.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bartlett at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Bartlett has higher obesity rates at 27.9% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Bartlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Federal way | Bartlett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,735) | 0.8% (341) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (15,003) | 13.5% (5,427) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (10,805) | 6.1% (2,440) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (20,761) | 34.2% (13,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Bartlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 13.5% in Bartlett.
- More residents in Federal way have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 6.1% in Bartlett.
- In Bartlett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.