Demographics details for Fayetteville, NC vs Yuma, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, NC vs Yuma, AZ.
Data | Fayetteville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Population | 208,873 | 98,527 |
Median Age | 30.5 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $53,424 | $59,312 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 9.0 |
Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Yuma
- In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 208,873, compared to 98,527 in Yuma.
- The median age in Yuma is higher at 32.0 years, compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
- Yuma has a higher median income of $59,312, compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
- In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fayetteville.
- The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 14% in Fayetteville.
- Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 5.9% in Fayetteville.
Demographics
Demographics Fayetteville vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fayetteville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 2 |
White | 31 | 13 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 13 | 61 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 21 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Yuma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 42% compared to 2% in Yuma.
- Fayetteville has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Fayetteville at 3% compared to 2% in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 13% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 10% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fayetteville and Yuma at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fayetteville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 24.0% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Yuma
- More residents in Fayetteville report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in Yuma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 24.0% compared to 19.3% in Yuma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Yuma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Fayetteville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 40.7% compared to 39.5% in Yuma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fayetteville at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fayetteville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,184) | 1.7% (1,642) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (28,602) | 13.2% (13,054) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (12,639) | 19.8% (19,520) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (36,676) | 12.3% (12,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Fayetteville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.