Demographics details for Fayetteville, NC vs Sanford, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, NC vs Sanford, ME.
Data | Fayetteville | Sanford |
---|---|---|
Population | 208,873 | 22,266 |
Median Age | 30.5 years | 39.3 years |
Median Income | $53,424 | $71,848 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Sanford
- In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 208,873, compared to 22,266 in Sanford.
- The median age in Sanford is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $71,848, compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fayetteville.
- Fayetteville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Sanford.
- The unemployment rate in Fayetteville is higher at 5.9%, compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Fayetteville vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fayetteville | Sanford |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 1 |
White | 31 | 89 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 13 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 42% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanford at 89% compared to 31% in Fayetteville.
- The Asian population is larger in Fayetteville at 3% compared to 2% in Sanford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fayetteville at 13% compared to 3% in Sanford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fayetteville at 10% compared to 5% in Sanford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fayetteville at 1% compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fayetteville | Sanford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.6% |
Depression | 24.0% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 33.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Fayetteville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sanford at 25.3% versus 24.0% in Fayetteville.
- Sanford has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Fayetteville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 40.7% compared to 33.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Fayetteville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fayetteville | Sanford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,184) | 0.4% (79) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (28,602) | 21.5% (4,797) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (12,639) | 12.1% (2,692) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (36,676) | 15.7% (3,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 13.7% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanford at 12.1%, compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.