Demographics details for Fayetteville, NC vs Oakland park, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, NC vs Oakland park, FL.

Data Fayetteville Oakland park
Population 208,873 43,824
Median Age 30.5 years 39.1 years
Median Income $53,424 $64,989
Married Families 33.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 14% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.9 3.1

Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Oakland park

  • In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 208,873, compared to 43,824 in Oakland park.
  • The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
  • Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fayetteville at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fayetteville and Oakland park at 14%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fayetteville is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.

Demographics

Demographics Fayetteville vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fayetteville Oakland park
Black 42 29
White 31 20
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 13 32
Two or More Races 10 17
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Oakland park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 42% compared to 29% in Oakland park.
  • Fayetteville has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fayetteville at 3% compared to 2% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 13% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 10% in Fayetteville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fayetteville at 1% compared to 0% in Oakland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fayetteville Oakland park
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 12.2%
Depression 24.0% 17.8%
Smoking 17.6% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 15.0%
Obesity 40.7% 31.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Oakland park

  • More residents in Fayetteville report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 24.0% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fayetteville at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 40.7% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fayetteville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fayetteville Oakland park
No Schooling 0.6% (1,184) 1.4% (596)
High School Diploma 13.7% (28,602) 19.8% (8,695)
Less than High School 6.1% (12,639) 16.2% (7,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.6% (36,676) 20.7% (9,073)

Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Fayetteville.
  • In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 13.7% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
  • In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.