Demographics details for Fayetteville, NC vs Laurel, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, NC vs Laurel, MD.
| Data | Fayetteville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 208,873 | 29,352 |
| Median Age | 30.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $53,424 | $92,035 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Laurel
- In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 208,873, compared to 29,352 in Laurel.
- The median age in Laurel is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035, compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fayetteville and Laurel at 33.0%.
- Fayetteville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate in Fayetteville is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.4% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Fayetteville vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fayetteville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 52 |
| White | 31 | 11 |
| Asian | 3 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 42% in Fayetteville.
- Fayetteville has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 3% in Fayetteville.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 13% in Fayetteville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fayetteville at 10% compared to 8% in Laurel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fayetteville and Laurel at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fayetteville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 13.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Laurel
- More residents in Fayetteville report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 24.0% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 17.6% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fayetteville at 16.6% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 40.7% compared to 36.6% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fayetteville at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fayetteville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,184) | 1.8% (521) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (28,602) | 10.0% (2,934) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (12,639) | 12.3% (3,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (36,676) | 30.9% (9,081) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Fayetteville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 12.3%, compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.