Demographics details for Fayetteville, NC vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, NC vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Fayetteville Fort atkinson
Population 208,873 12,412
Median Age 30.5 years 42.0 years
Median Income $53,424 $72,215
Married Families 33.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 14% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.9 3.2

Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 208,873, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
  • In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fayetteville.
  • Fayetteville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • The unemployment rate in Fayetteville is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fayetteville vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fayetteville Fort atkinson
Black 42 Data is updating
White 31 89
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 8
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 42% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 31% in Fayetteville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fayetteville at 3% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fayetteville at 13% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fayetteville at 10% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fayetteville at 1% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fayetteville Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 10.2%
Depression 24.0% 23.6%
Smoking 17.6% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 23.5%
Obesity 40.7% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Fort atkinson

  • More residents in Fayetteville report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 24.0% compared to 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fayetteville at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 16.6% in Fayetteville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 40.7% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fayetteville at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fayetteville Fort atkinson
No Schooling 0.6% (1,184) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 13.7% (28,602) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 6.1% (12,639) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.6% (36,676) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 13.7% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.