Demographics details for Fayetteville, GA vs Pleasant hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, GA vs Pleasant hill, MO.

Data Fayetteville Pleasant hill
Population 19,687 8,715
Median Age 43.4 years 36.9 years
Median Income $79,865 $88,408
Married Families 40.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Pleasant hill

  • In Fayetteville, the population is higher at 19,687, compared to 8,715 in Pleasant hill.
  • Residents in Fayetteville have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Pleasant hill.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $88,408, compared to $79,865 in Fayetteville.
  • In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fayetteville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pleasant hill at 8%, compared to 6% in Fayetteville.
  • The unemployment rate in Fayetteville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Pleasant hill.

Demographics

Demographics Fayetteville vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fayetteville Pleasant hill
Black 39 Data is updating
White 45 91
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Pleasant hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 39% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 91% compared to 45% in Fayetteville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fayetteville at 5% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fayetteville and Pleasant hill at 6%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fayetteville at 5% compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fayetteville and Pleasant hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fayetteville Pleasant hill
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 12.9%
Depression 19.1% 25.7%
Smoking 12.6% 22.4%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 16.7%
Obesity 30.1% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Pleasant hill

  • In Pleasant hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.4% in Fayetteville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant hill at 25.7% versus 19.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 12.6% in Fayetteville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasant hill at 16.7% compared to 15.8% in Fayetteville.
  • Pleasant hill has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 30.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fayetteville and Pleasant hill at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fayetteville Pleasant hill
No Schooling 0.5% (106) 0.5% (46)
High School Diploma 15.6% (3,062) 19.3% (1,682)
Less than High School 4.8% (937) 5.9% (517)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.1% (4,939) 16.9% (1,475)

Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Pleasant hill

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fayetteville and Pleasant hill at 0.5%.
  • In Pleasant hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pleasant hill at 5.9%, compared to 4.8% in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fayetteville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 16.9% in Pleasant hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.