Demographics details for Fayetteville, GA vs Milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fayetteville, GA vs Milford, CT.
Data | Fayetteville | Milford |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,687 | 50,471 |
Median Age | 43.4 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $79,865 | $104,503 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fayetteville vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 50,471, compared to 19,687 in Fayetteville.
- The median age in Milford is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 43.4 years in Fayetteville.
- Milford has a higher median income of $104,503, compared to $79,865 in Fayetteville.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fayetteville.
- Fayetteville has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fayetteville.
Demographics
Demographics Fayetteville vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fayetteville | Milford |
---|---|---|
Black | 39 | 2 |
White | 45 | 79 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Milford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fayetteville at 39% compared to 2% in Milford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 79% compared to 45% in Fayetteville.
- Both Fayetteville and Milford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- Milford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milford at 6%, compared to 5% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fayetteville and Milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fayetteville | Milford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.9% |
Depression | 19.1% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 12.6% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 27.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fayetteville vs Milford
- More residents in Fayetteville report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Milford at 20.5% versus 19.1% in Fayetteville.
- Milford has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 12.6% in Fayetteville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Milford at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Fayetteville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fayetteville at 30.1% compared to 27.5% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fayetteville at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fayetteville | Milford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (106) | 0.7% (366) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,062) | 16.7% (8,431) |
Less than High School | 4.8% (937) | 6.6% (3,307) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (4,939) | 36.0% (18,184) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fayetteville vs Milford
- In Milford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Fayetteville.
- In Milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Fayetteville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Milford at 6.6%, compared to 4.8% in Fayetteville.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 25.1% in Fayetteville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.