Demographics details for Faulkner, MD vs Porterville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Faulkner, MD vs Porterville, CA.

Data Faulkner Porterville
Population 312 62,998
Median Age 40.0 years 31.3 years
Median Income $80,000 $55,785
Married Families 60.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 5% 23%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 14.6

Population Comparison: Faulkner vs Porterville

  • The population in Porterville is higher at 62,998, compared to 312 in Faulkner.
  • Residents in Faulkner have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
  • Faulkner has a higher median income of $80,000 compared to $55,785 in Porterville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Faulkner at 60.0% compared to 33.0% in Porterville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Porterville at 23%, compared to 5% in Faulkner.
  • Porterville has a higher unemployment rate at 14.6% compared to 3.0% in Faulkner.

Demographics

Demographics Faulkner vs Porterville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Faulkner Porterville
Black 15 1
White 80 1
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 2 71
Two or More Races 1 21
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Faulkner vs Porterville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faulkner at 15% compared to 1% in Porterville.
  • Faulkner has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 1% in Porterville.
  • In Porterville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Faulkner.
  • Porterville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 2% in Faulkner.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Porterville at 21%, compared to 1% in Faulkner.
  • In Porterville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Faulkner.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Faulkner Porterville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.1%
Depression Data is updating% 20.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Faulkner vs Porterville

  • In Porterville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Porterville at 20.6% versus 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • Porterville has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Porterville at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • Porterville has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Porterville at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Faulkner Porterville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.8% (1,751)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.2% (7,695)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 35.0% (22,037)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.0% (5,010)

Education Levels Comparison: Faulkner vs Porterville

  • In Porterville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • In Porterville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Porterville at 35.0%, compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.
  • In Porterville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Faulkner.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.