Demographics details for Farson, WY vs Moultrie, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farson, WY vs Moultrie, GA.
| Data | Farson | Moultrie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 217 | 14,494 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $42,721 | $41,228 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Farson vs Moultrie
- The population in Moultrie is higher at 14,494, compared to 217 in Farson.
- Residents in Farson have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 35.9 years in Moultrie.
- Farson has a higher median income of $42,721 compared to $41,228 in Moultrie.
- In Moultrie, the percentage of married families is higher at 24.0%, compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- The poverty level is higher in Moultrie at 18%, compared to 10% in Farson.
- Moultrie has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Farson.
Demographics
Demographics Farson vs Moultrie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farson | Moultrie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 47 |
| White | 100 | 39 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 10 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farson vs Moultrie
- In Moultrie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 0% in Farson.
- Farson has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 39% in Moultrie.
- Both Farson and Moultrie have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Moultrie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moultrie at 3%, compared to 0% in Farson.
- In Moultrie, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farson | Moultrie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farson vs Moultrie
- In Moultrie, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Farson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Moultrie at 21.6% versus 20.3% in Farson.
- Moultrie has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 17.2% in Farson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farson at 19.0% compared to 12.6% in Moultrie.
- Moultrie has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 32.5% in Farson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Farson and Moultrie at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farson | Moultrie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (30) | 20.4% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 20.0% (2,895) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (35) | 12.3% (1,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farson vs Moultrie
- In Moultrie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- In Moultrie, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 13.8% in Farson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moultrie at 20.0%, compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 12.3% in Moultrie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.