Demographics details for Farson, WY vs Irving, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farson, WY vs Irving, TX.
| Data | Farson | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 217 | 254,715 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $42,721 | $76,686 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Farson vs Irving
- The population in Irving is higher at 254,715, compared to 217 in Farson.
- Residents in Farson have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 32.4 years in Irving.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686, compared to $42,721 in Farson.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 12%, compared to 10% in Farson.
- Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Farson.
Demographics
Demographics Farson vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farson | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 100 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 22 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 43 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farson vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Farson.
- Farson has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Irving, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 0% in Farson.
- Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 11%, compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farson and Irving at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farson | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farson vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.7% in Farson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Irving at 21.0% versus 20.3% in Farson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farson at 17.2% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farson at 19.0% compared to 17.4% in Irving.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farson at 32.5% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farson at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farson | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (4,699) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (30) | 10.3% (26,322) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 24.8% (63,108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (35) | 26.1% (66,363) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farson vs Irving
- In Irving, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farson hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 24.8%, compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- In Irving, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 16.1% in Farson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.