Demographics details for Farmington, WV vs Whiting, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, WV vs Whiting, KS.
Data | Farmington | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Population | 397 | 195 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $54,750 | $52,000 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Whiting
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 397, compared to 195 in Whiting.
- Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $54,750 compared to $52,000 in Whiting.
- In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.0%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 87 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Whiting
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Farmington and Whiting at 0%.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 87% in Whiting.
- Both Farmington and Whiting have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Whiting has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whiting at 11%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Whiting at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 9.9% |
Depression | 28.3% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Whiting
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 16.1% in Whiting.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 28.3% compared to 22.9% in Whiting.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 24.2% compared to 17.9% in Whiting.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whiting at 19.3% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 39.5% compared to 39.3% in Whiting.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Whiting.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Whiting |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 31.5% (125) | 28.7% (56) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (32) | 9.2% (18) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (39) | 14.9% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Whiting
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Farmington and Whiting at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 31.5% compared to 28.7% in Whiting.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whiting at 9.2%, compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- In Whiting, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.