Demographics details for Farmington, WV vs State line, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, WV vs State line, MS.

Data Farmington State line
Population 397 458
Median Age 37.1 years 34.0 years
Median Income $54,750 $38,529
Married Families 44.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.5

Population Comparison: Farmington vs State line

  • The population in State line is higher at 458, compared to 397 in Farmington.
  • Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 34.0 years in State line.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $54,750 compared to $38,529 in State line.
  • In State line, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
  • The poverty level is higher in State line at 18%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
  • State line has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.0% in Farmington.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs State line provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington State line
Black Data is updating 97
White 100 3
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs State line

  • In State line, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 97% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 3% in State line.
  • Both Farmington and State line have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Farmington and State line at 0%.
  • Both Farmington and State line have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and State line at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington State line
Mental Health Not Good 20.6% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 12.4%
Depression 28.3% 20.9%
Smoking 24.2% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 13.5%
Obesity 39.5% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 32.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs State line

  • More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in State line.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 28.3% compared to 20.9% in State line.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 24.2% compared to 20.0% in State line.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 14.9% compared to 13.5% in State line.
  • State line has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.5% in Farmington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in State line at 32.0% compared to 16.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington State line
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 31.5% (125) 55.9% (256)
Less than High School 8.1% (32) 28.8% (132)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (39) 4.1% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs State line

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Farmington and State line at 0.0%.
  • In State line, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 55.9% compared to 31.5% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in State line at 28.8%, compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 4.1% in State line.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.