Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Westminster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Westminster, CA.
Data | Farmington | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,127 | 89,397 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $61,388 | $80,271 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 89,397, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271, compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.4% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 32 | 16 |
Asian | 1 | 51 |
Hispanic | 26 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
American Indian | 29 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Westminster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Farmington and Westminster at 1%.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 51%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 24% in Westminster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 8% in Westminster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 0% in Westminster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.1% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 23.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Westminster
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 18.2% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 13.5% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 34.4% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Westminster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 4.5% (4,006) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 16.0% (14,303) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 21.5% (19,217) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 18.5% (16,558) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Westminster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Westminster at 21.5%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.