Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Farmington | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Sterling
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 46,127, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 32 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | 29 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Sterling
- In Sterling, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 56% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 26% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 11% in Farmington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 1% in Sterling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Sterling
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 22.2% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.