Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Rockingham, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Rockingham, NC.
Data | Farmington | Rockingham |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,127 | 91,957 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 45.1 years |
Median Income | $61,388 | $50,737 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Rockingham
- The population in Rockingham is higher at 91,957, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Rockingham is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
- In Rockingham, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockingham at 13%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Rockingham.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Rockingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Rockingham |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 32 | 70 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 26 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | 29 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Rockingham
- In Rockingham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockingham at 70% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- Both Farmington and Rockingham have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 6% in Rockingham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 5% in Rockingham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 1% in Rockingham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Rockingham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 20.1% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Rockingham
- In Rockingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockingham at 24.9% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Rockingham has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Rockingham has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Rockingham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 0.8% (738) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 19.9% (18,325) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 20.9% (19,256) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 11.1% (10,198) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Rockingham
- In Rockingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Rockingham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockingham at 20.9%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.