Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Rancho cucamonga, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.

Data Farmington Rancho cucamonga
Population 46,127 176,336
Median Age 35.7 years 37.5 years
Median Income $61,388 $105,534
Married Families 34.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Farmington vs Rancho cucamonga

  • The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
  • The median age in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 11%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
  • The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.8% in Rancho cucamonga.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington Rancho cucamonga
Black 1 9
White 32 22
Asian 1 14
Hispanic 26 39
Two or More Races 11 15
American Indian 29 1

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 26% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 11% in Farmington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 1% in Rancho cucamonga.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington Rancho cucamonga
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 9.8%
Depression 20.1% 17.2%
Smoking 18.2% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 13.5% 16.6%
Obesity 34.4% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Rancho cucamonga

  • More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 18.2% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 34.4% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington Rancho cucamonga
No Schooling 0.5% (211) 1.2% (2,052)
High School Diploma 13.4% (6,180) 11.7% (20,590)
Less than High School 12.9% (5,929) 10.0% (17,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.0% (5,985) 25.3% (44,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.