Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Pachuta, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Pachuta, MS.
| Data | Farmington | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 199 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 53.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $31,964 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Pachuta
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 46,127, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
- The median age in Pachuta is higher at 53.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Pachuta at 21%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Pachuta.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Pachuta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 39 |
| White | 32 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 29 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pachuta at 55% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 1% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 6% in Pachuta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 47.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pachuta at 24.7% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Pachuta has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 13.5% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 16.1% (32) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 24.6% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 8.0% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Pachuta
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pachuta at 24.6%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.