Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Lancaster, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Lancaster, PA.

Data Farmington Lancaster
Population 46,127 57,453
Median Age 35.7 years 31.8 years
Median Income $61,388 $61,014
Married Families 34.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.9

Population Comparison: Farmington vs Lancaster

  • The population in Lancaster is higher at 57,453, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
  • Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
  • The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.9% in Lancaster.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington Lancaster
Black 1 18
White 32 24
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 26 40
Two or More Races 11 15
American Indian 29 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 24% in Lancaster.
  • In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 26% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 11% in Farmington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 0% in Lancaster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington Lancaster
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 14.4%
Depression 20.1% 21.8%
Smoking 18.2% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 13.5% 14.9%
Obesity 34.4% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Lancaster

  • More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 21.8% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
  • Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 14.9% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
  • Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington Lancaster
No Schooling 0.5% (211) 1.9% (1,077)
High School Diploma 13.4% (6,180) 16.7% (9,588)
Less than High School 12.9% (5,929) 18.6% (10,712)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.0% (5,985) 17.4% (10,012)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
  • In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 18.6%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
  • In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.