Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Gordon, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Gordon, GA.
| Data | Farmington | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 58,954 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $57,555 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Gordon
- The population in Gordon is higher at 58,954, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Gordon is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Gordon at 20%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.7% in Gordon.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Gordon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 32 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 29 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Gordon
- In Gordon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gordon at 71% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- Both Farmington and Gordon have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 16% in Gordon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 6% in Gordon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 2% in Gordon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gordon at 23.1% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Gordon has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gordon at 15.7% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Gordon has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Farmington and Gordon at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 1.6% (918) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 17.8% (10,497) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 28.5% (16,793) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 11.1% (6,523) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Gordon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gordon at 28.5%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.