Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Florence, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Florence, OR.
| Data | Farmington | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 9,376 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 57.7 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $57,568 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Florence
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 46,127, compared to 9,376 in Florence.
- The median age in Florence is higher at 57.7 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $57,568 in Florence.
- In Florence, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Farmington and Florence at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Florence.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Florence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 32 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 29 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Florence
- In Florence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Florence at 87% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- In Florence, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 5% in Florence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 3% in Florence.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 1% in Florence.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 29.2% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Florence
- In Florence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Florence at 29.2% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Florence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Florence at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Florence has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Florence at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 0.4% (35) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 14.2% (1,331) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 15.6% (1,467) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 19.9% (1,865) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Florence
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Florence.
- In Florence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Florence at 15.6%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- In Florence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.