Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Farmington | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Eureka
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 46,127, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Eureka.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 32 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | 29 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 1% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eureka at 88% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 2% in Eureka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 8% in Eureka.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 0% in Eureka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Eureka
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eureka at 22.8% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 18.2% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 34.4% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.