Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Drakesboro, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Drakesboro, KY.
Data | Farmington | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,127 | 474 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $61,388 | $39,659 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Drakesboro
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 46,127, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- The median age in Drakesboro is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388 compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Drakesboro at 15%, compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Drakesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Drakesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 9 |
White | 32 | 83 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
American Indian | 29 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Drakesboro at 83% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 1% compared to 0% in Drakesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 7% in Drakesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 11% compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 0% in Drakesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 21.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.1% |
Depression | 20.1% | 29.5% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 27.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Drakesboro at 29.5% versus 20.1% in Farmington.
- Drakesboro has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Drakesboro at 13.8% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Drakesboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 1.7% (8) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 28.7% (136) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 28.3% (134) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 0.8% (4) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Drakesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Drakesboro at 28.3%, compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.