Demographics details for Farmington, NM vs Chandler, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, NM vs Chandler, AZ.
| Data | Farmington | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,127 | 280,711 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,388 | $99,374 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Chandler
- The population in Chandler is higher at 280,711, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374, compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 32 | 48 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 29 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Chandler
- In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 48% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 26% compared to 21% in Chandler.
- Both Farmington and Chandler have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Farmington at 29% compared to 2% in Chandler.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 27.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Chandler
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 20.1% compared to 18.5% in Chandler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 18.2% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 34.4% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (211) | 0.8% (2,196) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (6,180) | 10.1% (28,272) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (5,929) | 6.8% (18,988) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,985) | 31.0% (86,947) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.