Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Topeka, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Topeka, KS.
| Data | Farmington | Topeka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,566 | 125,449 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $114,737 | $54,052 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Topeka
- The population in Topeka is higher at 125,449, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- The median age in Topeka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $54,052 in Topeka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- The poverty level is higher in Topeka at 14%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Topeka has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Topeka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Topeka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 10 |
| White | 85 | 62 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Topeka
- In Topeka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 2% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Topeka at 9%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
- In Topeka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Topeka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Topeka
- In Topeka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Topeka at 25.5% versus 22.6% in Farmington.
- Topeka has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 16.9% in Topeka.
- Topeka has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Topeka at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Topeka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 1.1% (1,326) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 17.2% (21,594) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 10.9% (13,657) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 19.3% (24,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Topeka
- In Topeka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- In Topeka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Topeka at 10.9%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 19.3% in Topeka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.