Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Spokane valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Spokane valley, WA.

Data Farmington Spokane valley
Population 23,566 107,325
Median Age 35.1 years 37.4 years
Median Income $114,737 $66,483
Married Families 41.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Farmington vs Spokane valley

  • The population in Spokane valley is higher at 107,325, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
  • The median age in Spokane valley is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $66,483 in Spokane valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 37.0% in Spokane valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spokane valley at 10%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • Spokane valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs Spokane valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington Spokane valley
Black 3 1
White 85 82
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 5 7
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Spokane valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 82% in Spokane valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 2% in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spokane valley at 7%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
  • In Spokane valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington Spokane valley
Mental Health Not Good 13.3% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 11.5%
Depression 22.6% 28.7%
Smoking 13.7% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 18.5%
Obesity 31.8% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Spokane valley

  • In Spokane valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane valley at 28.7% versus 22.6% in Farmington.
  • Spokane valley has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Spokane valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 31.8% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington Spokane valley
No Schooling 0.4% (86) 0.6% (596)
High School Diploma 11.3% (2,674) 15.6% (16,779)
Less than High School 7.1% (1,662) 7.2% (7,741)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.4% (5,505) 17.1% (18,346)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Spokane valley

  • In Spokane valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
  • In Spokane valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spokane valley at 7.2%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 17.1% in Spokane valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.