Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Mesquite, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Mesquite, TX.
Data | Farmington | Mesquite |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,566 | 147,899 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 33.4 years |
Median Income | $114,737 | $69,649 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Mesquite
- The population in Mesquite is higher at 147,899, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 33.4 years in Mesquite.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $69,649 in Mesquite.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Mesquite.
- The poverty level is higher in Mesquite at 9%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Mesquite has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Mesquite provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Mesquite |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 25 |
White | 85 | 10 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 45 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Mesquite
- In Mesquite, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 10% in Mesquite.
- Both Farmington and Mesquite have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Mesquite has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mesquite at 16%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
- In Mesquite, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Mesquite |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.6% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 35.6% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Mesquite
- In Mesquite, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mesquite at 23.3% versus 22.6% in Farmington.
- Mesquite has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Mesquite.
- Mesquite has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mesquite at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Mesquite |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 1.7% (2,448) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 15.8% (23,375) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 22.4% (33,127) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 10.8% (15,989) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Mesquite
- In Mesquite, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- In Mesquite, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mesquite at 22.4%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 10.8% in Mesquite.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.