Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Mead, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Mead, WA.
| Data | Farmington | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,566 | 7,275 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $114,737 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Mead
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 7,275 in Mead.
- The median age in Mead is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $85,000 in Mead.
- In Mead, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Farmington and Mead at 5%.
- Mead has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Mead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 95 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Mead
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mead at 95% compared to 85% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 2% in Mead.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 1% in Mead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 4% compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Mead at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Mead
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 31.8% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmington at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Mead
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.