Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Laurel, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Laurel, MD.
| Data | Farmington | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,566 | 29,352 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $114,737 | $92,035 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 29,352, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- The median age in Laurel is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $92,035 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 33.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 9%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 52 |
| White | 85 | 11 |
| Asian | 3 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 3% in Farmington.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 8%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 13.1% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Laurel
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 13.7% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 1.8% (521) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 10.0% (2,934) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 12.3% (3,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 30.9% (9,081) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 11.3% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 12.3%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 23.4% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.